Judgment · High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 21
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. The application is disposed of. *Divya (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.720 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.309 OF 2025 (Deepak @ Zhansi s/o Shankarlal Kumlele Vs. State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court's or Judge's Order Mr. R.M. Daga, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.M. Ghogare, APP for the State. CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- APRIL 15, 2025. Heard.
#2. By this application, the applicant is seeking speaking two minutes in the order dated 04/04/2025 passed by this Court.
#3. Inadvertently, in the order dated 04/04/2025, it is mentioned in paragraph No.3, line No.3 that “since then, charge is not framed”. It should be “charge is not framed against accused No.3 till 31/01/2025”.
#4. Similarly, paragraph No.7 should be “In view of the observation of the Hon’ble Apex Court, perusal of the roznama and the statement made by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the charge is not framed against accused No.3 till 31/01/2025 and considering that there is inordinate delay in disposal of the trial, and right of the present applicant as to the speedy trial enshrined
903.appa.720.25.odt 2 under Article 21 of the Constitution is violated, the application deserves to be allowed.”
#5. The order dated 04/04/2025 be corrected and the corrected copy of the order be uploaded accordingly.
#6. The application is disposed of. *Divya (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 21.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 15 Apr 2025. The bench was URMILA JOSHIPHALKE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.