Writ Petition No. 2244 of 2012 · Bombay High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2244 of 2012 (Gopal S. Agrawal v. Milan Cut Piece Shop and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's order Court's or Judge's orders Shri B.N. Mohta, Advocate for Petitioner. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 7 th May, 2012 The application Exhibit 122 filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 4 for placing the documents on record under Order VIII, Rule 1-A(3) of the Civil Procedure Court has been allowed by the impugned order dated 21-3-2012. The reasons are recorded for taking the documents on record. No interference is called for in the impugned order. Shri Mohta, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/plaintiff, submits that there is no finding recorded by the Trial Court regarding relevancy of these documents and there is also no reason recorded in respect of delay in submitting the documents. The question of relevancy of the documents will be decided by the Court as and when the documents are tendered in evidence. So far as the question of delay is concerned, the Trial Court has exercised the discretion under the said provision of the 2 0705wp2244.12.odt Civil Procedure Code. Hence, the order impugned does not call for interference. Shri Mohta for the petitioner/plaintiff submits that as per the provisions of Section 38 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, the suit is required to be decided within a period of twelve months. Keeping in view the said provisions, it is expected that the Trial Court will proceed further with the matter. With these observations, the petition is dismissed. Judge