BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR v. Bharat Krishnarao Mohadikar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Both the applications are disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. T.A.Mirza, APP for the appellant. Mr. S.G.Karmarkar, Advocate for applicant/ respondent no.4. CORAM : MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & P.B.VARALE, JJ DATE : 15.3.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant- respondent no.4 and learned APP for appellant State. The State has preferred appeal against acquittal of the applicant along with other accused. This Court by order dated 9.2.2011 admitted the appeal and directed that action be taken against the respondents i.e. including the present applicant under section 390 Cr.P.C.. Pursuant to the said order the applicant / 2` respondent no.4 has preferred these applications for surrendering before this Court and for grant of bail. In view of the fact that the applicant has been acquitted by the Sessions Court and the other facts and circumstances of these case, we grant permission to the applicant / respondent no.4 to surrender before this court. The applicant/ respondent no.4 is present before the court. He be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. Time of four weeks is granted to furnish surety. The applicant shall report to Kuhi Police Station once in a week till disposal of the appeal. Both the applications are disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE 3`
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Both the applications are disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.