✦ Bombay High Court

(Mitharam Pundlik Bhagewar (dead) thr. LR’s Shri Pandurang & Ors. v. Shri Gajanan Maharaj Paduka Sansthan, Mundgaon, thr. President Shri Jawahar Singh Asole) & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 596 of 2024R M JOSHI

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. All issues are kept open. Needless to say that the order of registration of the appeal also stands set aside.

Judgment

(Mitharam Pundlik Bhagewar (dead) thr. LR’s Shri Pandurang s/o Mitharam Bhagewar and others Vs. Shri Gajanan Maharaj Paduka Sansthan, Mundgaon, thr. President Shri Jawahar Singh Asole and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. A. J. Thakkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. V. B. Bhisde, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. B. M. Lonare, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 & 4/State. CORAM: R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE: 11 th JUNE, 2025.

1.

After hearing learned counsel for both sides for sometime, they are unanimous make a statement that order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated

14.12.2021 passed in Revision No.REV/TNC/AKO-100/2018 so also order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Akot dated 04.10.2018 in proceedings bearing Rev. Case No.TNC- 107/Mundgaon/02/2014-2015 be set aside. They further request for remitting the proceedings before the Sub Divisional Officer for decision afresh firstly on the point of limitation.

2.

By consent of both sides, the impugned order is set aside so also order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer dated 04.10.2018 in proceedings bearing Rev. Case No.TNC- 107/Mundgaon/02/2014-2015 aside. The proceedings bearing in Revision No.REV/TNC/AKO- 2 wp596.24.O.odt 100/2018 stand relegated back to the Sub Divisional Officer for deciding the application for condonation of delay filed by respondent – trust.

3.

The Sub Divisional Officer to decide this application within a period of eight weeks.

5.

All issues are kept open. Needless to say that the order of registration of the appeal also stands set aside.

6.

Parties are directed to appear before the Sub Divisional Officer on 18.06.2025.

7.

The Sub Divisional Officer is not required any fresh notice.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 596 of 2024). ← Search more judgments