Mohd. Asif v. State of Maharashtra Court's or Judge's Order
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The criminal application is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. The criminal application is disposed of. [URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.]
Judgment
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. A.M. Jaltare, counsel for applicant. Mr. N.B. Jawade, APP for non-applicant/State. Mr. C.A. Babrekar, counsel for intervenor. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 27/03/2025.
#1. Apprehending the arrest at the hands of police in connection with Crime No. 702/2024 registered with Rajapeth Police Station, District Amravati for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the applicant approached this Court for grant of pre-arrest bail.
#2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, who submitted that as far as the present applicant is concerned, against whom the allegation is only to the extent that he threatened the witnesses with dire consequences. He submitted that even that allegation was not heard by anybody directly, but it was informed to the witnesses by a third person. Thus, considering the role attributed to the present applicant, his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of that, he be protected by granting anticipatory bail. 2 11aba5.2025.odt
#3. Learned APP strongly opposed the said application and submitted that, in furtherance of the common intention, the alleged crime is committed by the present applicant and the other co-accused and therefore, the application deserves to be rejected.
#4. Learned counsel, Mr. C.A Babrekar for the complainant, also reiterated the said contention and prayed for rejection of the application.
#5. On hearing both sides and on perusal of the investigation papers, it reveals that the report is lodged by the complainant on an allegation that Abdul Akib Abdul Wahab, who is the deceased in the present crime, was having a love affair with one girl from the last two years. Both the family members came to know about the relationship, and therefore, a dispute arose between them. In the said incident, the deceased was assaulted by the co- accused, as far as the present applicant is concerned, the only allegation is that he has threatened by saying that they have to face the dire consequences.
#6. Thus, considering the limited role of the present applicant, the interim relief was granted by way of ad- interim anticipatory bail deserves to be confirmed, and considering the investigation papers, the custodial interrogation of the present applicant is not required.
#7. In view of that, interim protection granted to the present applicant by order dated 06/01/2025 is hereby confirmed on the condition that he shall attend the 3 11aba5.2025.odt Rajapeth Police Station, District Amravati, once in a week on Monday between 10.00 a.m. to 01.00 p.m., and shall cooperate with the investigating agency, and other conditions shall remain stands still.
#8. The criminal application is disposed of. [URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The criminal application is disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 27 Mar 2025. The bench was PHALKE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.