✦ Bombay High Court · 30 Dec 2011

RANA KAMLAKAR BANSODE v. THE STATE OF MAH & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 1199 of 2011

Case at a glance

Order date
30 Dec 2011

Outcome

Withdrawn

Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Leave to withdraw petition with liberty to move against the impugned order before the Appellate Forum is sought. Leave is granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Forum in accordance with the…

Judgment

RANA KAMLAKAR BANSODE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Kawade Arvind R. APP for Respondents: Mr. V.G.Shelke. ... CORAM : U. D. SALVI VACATION JUDGE. Dated: December 30, 2011 ... PER COURT :-

3.

Heard. Perused. The petitioner intends to take recourse to the alternate remedy of appeal under section 60 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 and seeks limited respite enabling him to prefer an appeal against the impugned order.

Operative part

4.

Leave to withdraw petition with liberty to move against the impugned order before the Appellate Forum is sought. Leave is granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Forum in accordance with the law on or before 9 th January, 2012. Impugned order is stayed till then.

5.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order, duly signed by the Court Sheristedar. aaa/- ... ( U. D. SALVI ) VACATION JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bombay Police Act, 1951 — s. 60.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 30 Dec 2011.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1199 of 2011). ← Search more judgments