Judgment · High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Learned A.P.P. states on instructions that her client would first obtain sanction under section 197 of Cr.P.C. for prosecuting the accused and other Government Officers and then file afresh charge-sheet against him and others. She says that her client is withdrawing the charge-sheet filed…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5274 OF 2011 (Vishnu s/o. Sambhaji Waghmode Vs. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE,J. DATED : 24.04.2012 Mr.A.G.Mukhedkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shelke, A.P.P. for respondent/State.
#1. Learned A.P.P. states on instructions that her client would first obtain sanction under section 197 of Cr.P.C. for prosecuting the accused and other Government Officers and then file afresh charge-sheet against him and others. She says that her client is withdrawing the charge-sheet filed against the applicant and other Government Officers. Therefore, this writ petition does not survive and stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE,J.] snk/2012/APR12/cria5274.11
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 197.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 24 Apr 2012. The bench was A V NIRGUDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.