DAGDU MAHARUDRA GIRAM v. Mr. S. W. Munde, AGP
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7515 OF 2023 DAGDU MAHARUDRA GIRAM VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE HONBLE MINISTER AND OTHERS Mr. Kishor R. Doke, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. W. Munde, AGP for Respondents-State. … … CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 10th JULY, 2023. PER COURT:-
#1. The petitioner has put forth a host of disputed issues. The petitioner desires that the order passed by the Tahsildar dated 26.10.2021 under Section 38 (E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, be quashed and set aside.
#2. There is no dispute that there is a statutory remedy available to the petitioner to assail the order dated 26.10.2021. A writ petition for challenging the said order, bypassing available remedies, need not be entertained.
#3. This petition is, therefore, disposed off. If the petitioner faces an issue of delay in approaching the Appellate Authority, the time spent by the petitioner in this Court from
09.10.2022 till the passing of this order, would be considered as a good ground for condonation of delay. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/July-2023
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.