CA13136.2023odt & Ors. v. Manik Havagirao Gangapure & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. For the reasons cited in the applications, same are allowed. Delay caused in preferring the First Appeals by the Acquiring Body is condoned. Appeals be registered. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE] JUDGE JUDGE [R. G. AVACHAT] SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To…
Judgment
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13139 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL [ST] NO. 27605 OF 2023 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13142 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL [ST] NO. 27602 OF 2023 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13146 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL [ST] NO. 27598 OF 2023 …… Mr. Rajendraa S. Deshmukh, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. B. R. Survase, Advocate for the Applicant/s in all the matters. Mr. P. V. Mandlik, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. S. S. Chillarge – Advocate for the Claimants/Respondents. Shri. S. D. Ghayal, Smt. V. S. Chaudhari, Smt. U. S. Bhosale, and Smt. S. N. Deshmukh, Shri. B. B. Bhise - Addl. G.P. and AGPs for the Respondent/s – State in the respective matters. ….. CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ. DATED : 03RD MAY, 2024 PER COURT : -
#1. Not on board. Taken on board at the request of learned advocate for the Applicants. 2 929CA13136.2023&Ors.odt
#2. These are the applications for condonation of 116 days’ delay caused in preferring the First Appeals by the Acquiring Body against the Judgment and Award passed by the learned Reference Court.
#3. Heard both the sides. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. P. V. Mandlik for Claimants fairly submits that the Court may consider the condonation of delay.
#4. We have gone through the applications for condonation of delay.
#5. For the reasons cited in the applications, same are allowed. Delay caused in preferring the First Appeals by the Acquiring Body is condoned. Appeals be registered. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE] JUDGE JUDGE [R. G. AVACHAT] SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 06/05/2024 15:20:55
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.