K.H. Ranganath & Ors. v. Mansingh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Shri. M.M. Ambhore, Advocate for petitioners. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & SHRIHARI P DAWARE, JJ. DATE: 25th NOVEMBER 2010 PER COURT : 1) 2) Heard. The petitioners have alternative remedies. 3) No interference is called for in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction 2 under Article 226 of the Constitution and in the light of the facts and the documents placed on record. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. All issues are kept open. Sd/- Sd/- (SHRIHARI P DAWARE, J.)(NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.10275.10
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 25 Nov 2010. The bench was SHRIHARI P DAWARE, NARESH H PATIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.