THE STATE OF MAH ADN ANR v. BANDU GANGARAM THOTE AND
Case Details
( 1 ) fast8700.10 IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT, HELD ON 12.11.2022, AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD 21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7118 OF 2010 IN FAST/8700/2010 WITH CA/7119/2010 IN FAST/8700/2010 THE STATE OF MAH ADN ANR VERSUS BANDU GANGARAM THOTE AND 22 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7862 OF 2010 IN FAST/13703/2010 WITH CA/7863/2010 IN FAST/13703/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR VERSUS SUBHASH SAKHARAM RATHOD AND 23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10211 OF 2010 IN FAST/18872/2010 WITH CA/10215/2010 IN FAST/18917/2010 WITH CA/10216/2010 IN FAST/18917/2010 WITH CA/10214/2010 IN FAST/18921/2010 WITH CA/10213/2010 IN FAST/18921/2010 WITH CA/10212/2010 IN FAST/18872/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS LINGRAM ANURODH PATIL AND 24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11341 OF 2010 IN FAST/20995/2010 WITH CA/11348/2010 IN FAST/21087/2010 WITH CA/11342/2010 IN FAST/20995/2010 WITH CA/11353/2010 IN FAST/21077/2010 WITH CA/11356/2010 IN FAST/21080/2010 WITH CA/11359/2010 IN ( 2 ) fast8700.10 FAST/21094/2010 WITH CA/11349/2010 IN FAST/21072/2010 WITH CA/11357/2010 IN FAST/21084/2010 WITH CA/11343/2010 IN FAST/21102/2010 WITH CA/11345/2010 IN FAST/21090/2010 WITH CA/11352/2010 IN FAST/21099/2010 WITH CA/11358/2010 IN FAST/21084/2010 WITH CA/11364/2010 IN FAST/21092/2010 WITH CA/11347/2010 IN FAST/21087/2010 WITH CA/11344/2010 IN FAST/21102/2010 WITH CA/11350/2010 IN FAST/21072/2010 WITH CA/11362/2010 IN FAST/21075/2010 WITH CA/11346/2010 IN FAST/21090/2010 WITH CA/11360/2010 IN FAST/21094/2010 WITH CA/11363/2010 IN FAST/21092/2010 WITH CA/11354/2010 IN FAST/21077/2010 WITH CA/11351/2010 IN FAST/21099/2010 WITH CA/11355/2010 IN FAST/21080/2010 WITH CA/11361/2010 IN FAST/21075/2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS CHANDRAKANT KASHINATH MIRCHE AND 25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12105 OF 2010 IN FAST/22654/2010 WITH CA/12116/2010 IN FAST/22706/2010 WITH CA/12115/2010 IN FAST/22706/2010 WITH CA/12107/2010 IN FAST/22688/2010 WITH CA/12108/2010 IN FAST/22688/2010 WITH CA/12118/2010 IN FAST/22711/2010 WITH CA/12112/2010 IN FAST/22694/2010 WITH CA/12106/2010 IN FAST/22654/2010 WITH CA/12117/2010 IN FAST/22711/2010 WITH CA/12111/2010 IN FAST/22694/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS UDHAV DNYANOBA KENDRE AND 26 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14562 OF 2010 IN FAST/28127/2010 WITH CA/14563/2010 IN ( 3 ) fast8700.10 FAST/28127/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS KASHINATH VISHWANATH PALSE AND 27 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14701 OF 2010 IN FAST/27021/2010 WITH CA/14702/2010 IN FAST/27021/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS DNYANOBA VISHWANATH GOKANDE AND 28 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16243 OF 2010 IN FAST/30076/2010 WITH CA/16247/2010 IN FAST/30100/2010 WITH CA/16246/2010 IN FAST/30094/2010 WITH CA/16248/2010 IN FAST/30100/2010 WITH CA/16245/2010 IN FAST/30094/2010 WITH CA/16244/2010 IN FAST/30076/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS RAMKISHAN DNYANOBA SUNAR AND ANR AND 29 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.17015 OF 2010 IN FAST/33217/2010 WITH CA/17016/2010 IN FAST/33217/2010 WITH CA/17022/2010 IN FAST/33221/2010 WITH CA/17021/2010 IN FAST/33221/2010 WITH CA/17020/2010 IN FAST/33183/2010 WITH CA/17017/2010 IN FAST/33213/2010 WITH CA/17019/2010 IN FAST/33183/2010 WITH CA/17018/2010 IN FAST/33213/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS ( 4 ) fast8700.10 GYANDEV TIKAJI RATHOD AND ANR AND 30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10554 OF 2012 IN FAST/19299/2012 WITH CA/10548/2012 IN FAST/19308/2012 THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR VERSUS GUNDU PASHA ANWAR @ ANSAR SAHEB SHAIKH AND 31 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5745 OF 2015 IN FAST/9701/2015 WITH CA/5744/2015 IN FAST/9701/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS BALAJI RAMKISHAN MARLAPALLE AND 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5775 OF 2015 IN FAST/13310/2015 WITH CA/5776/2015 IN FAST/13310/2015 WITH CA/5777/2015 IN FAST/13353/2015 WITH CA/5778/2015 IN FAST/13353/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS TRIMBAK NIVRATI GAJILE AND 33 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6250 OF 2015 IN FAST/9100/2015 WITH CA/6259/2015 IN FAST/9109/2015 WITH CA/6266/2015 IN FAST/9106/2015 WITH CA/6268/2015 IN FAST/9097/2015 WITH CA/6254/2015 IN FAST/9115/2015 WITH CA/6269/2015 IN FAST/9097/2015 WITH CA/6252/2015 IN FAST/9121/2015 WITH CA/6271/2015 IN FAST/9124/2015 WITH CA/6264/2015 IN FAST/9103/2015 WITH CA/6251/2015 IN FAST/9100/2015 WITH CA/6256/2015 IN FAST/9112/2015 WITH CA/6262/2015 IN FAST/9054/2015 WITH CA/6260/2015 ( 5 ) fast8700.10 IN FAST/9118/2015 WITH CA/6267/2015 IN FAST/9106/2015 WITH CA/6258/2015 IN FAST/9109/2015 WITH CA/6255/2015 IN FAST/9115/2015 WITH CA/6253/2015 IN FAST/9121/2015 WITH CA/6261/2015 IN FAST/9118/2015 WITH CA/6265/2015 IN FAST/9103/2015 WITH CA/6263/2015 IN FAST/9054/2015 WITH CA/6257/2015 IN FAST/9112/2015 WITH CA/6270/2015 IN FAST/9124/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS UTTAM BHUJANG SURNER AND ANOTHER AND 34 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12281 OF 2015 IN FAST/25645/2015 WITH CA/12288/2015 IN FAST/25701/2015 WITH CA/12291/2015 IN FAST/25704/2015 WITH CA/12289/2015 IN FAST/25701/2015 WITH CA/12282/2015 IN FAST/25645/2015 WITH CA/12292/2015 IN FAST/25704/2015 WITH CA/12287/2015 IN FAST/25696/2015 WITH CA/12283/2015 IN FAST/25693/2015 WITH CA/12286/2015 IN FAST/25696/2015 WITH CA/12285/2015 IN FAST/25693/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS BALIRAM SADHU BANKAR ... ( 6 ) fast8700.10
Legal Reasoning
Mr.A. M. Phule, AGP for the appellants Mr. H. B. Nandgavale, Advocate h/f Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the respondents in respective appeals Mr. V. V. Ingole, Advocate in respective matters
Decision
O R D E R (12th NOVEMBER, 2022) Civil Application for condonation of delay:- 1. Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the application and as the parties are arrived at amicable settlement, it is desirable to condone the delay, the delay stands condoned. The civil applications for condonation of delay in respective appeals stand disposed off. Office to register the appeals. Appeals:- 1. These appeals are placed before us in today’s National Lok- Adalat. Mr. P. S. Mengshetti, Dy. Collector, Latur is present. 2. Mr. Phule, learned AGP submits that above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by Government Resolution No. Sankirna- 2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03-11-2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23-02-2017 and 13-08-2018 to the said Government Resolution. Hence, the group of appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals. ( 7 ) fast8700.10 3. The learned AGP states that entire amount in these appeals has been deposited and later-on the said amount has been withdrawn by the original claimants by obtaining orders from this court. He submits that in these circumstances nothing survived in these appeals. 4. However, before disposing off the appeals, it is further clarified that in case the amount is not deposited as per the award, the State Government undertakes to deposit the said amount within a period of one year in the concerned Reference Court. If the amount is not withdrawn by the claimants/respondents, same is allowed to be withdrawn and office to allow withdrawal. If the said amount is not deposited, they are at liberty to withdraw the same after the amount is deposited. 5. 6. 7. The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The court fee refund certificate be issued as per the provisions under the of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. ( 8 ) fast8700.10 8. In view of withdrawal of these appeals, pending civil applications, if any stand disposed off. [A. R. BORULKAR] Advocate Member [S. G. SHETE] DJ (Retd.) Member [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Head of Panel VishalK/fast8700.10