NO. 10146 OF 2026 Ramkrushna Shaurao Misal VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra & Ors. v. V. C. P. Mundinamani1

*3* 72-wp-10146-2026over one year and hence, the employee is entitled to anincrement even if he/she retires on 30th June of a particular year.6.Insofar as cases wherein an employee may have workedfor a lessor duration during one year, Rule 10 of theMaharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay), Rules, 2009 wouldcover cases of employees who have worked for six months andabove in the revised pay structure as on 1st July, and would alsobe entitled for the increment. All those Petitioners who haveworked for six months and above in a particular year, would beentitled for the benefits of the annual increment and theirretirement dues would be calculated by reckoning suchincrement while calculating their last drawn wages.7.In view of the above, this Petition is partly allowed withthe following directions:- (a) The Petitioners would be entitled for monetarybenefits/difference of pensionary benefits as per the actualsw.e.f. their respective dates of superannuation, providedthey have worked for 6 months or more in the last year upto their superannuation. Narwade *4* 72-wp-10146-2026(b) The pensionary benefits of the Petitioners would berecalculated by including the annual increment in their lastdrawn salary prior to their superannuation and suchrecalculated pensionary benefits shall be payable to them.(c) Arrears if any, shall be paid to them within a period of 90days. Many of the Petitioners have approached belatedlybefore this Court and, therefore, akin to the orders passed inseveral matters, they would be not entitled for the interestcomponent.8.At this stage, learned Advocate for the petitioners submitsthat some of the petitioners are granted the benefits of onenotional increment by the learned District Judge, if that is so, this order would not be applicable to all those petitioners whohave already received the benefits. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)Narwade