✦ Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 10554 of 2025 · Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 10554 of 2025HITEN S VENEGAVKAR2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn withliberty as prayed for, if occasion arises

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. The Government Resolution dated 20th February 2025,states that:-“ekgs tqYkS] 2017 iwohZ vYila[;kad fodkl foHkkxkekQZr rlspvYila[;kd fodkl foHkkx vfLRkRokr ;s.;kiwohZ ‘kkys; f’k{k.k o dzhMkfoHkkx] mPp o ra= f’k{k.k foHkkx bR;knh foHkkxkaekQZr T;k ‘kS{kf.kdlaLFkkauh /kkfeZd@Hkkf” kd vYila[;kd ntkZ izkIr d#u ?ksryk vkgs] v’kkloZ ‘kS{kf.kd laLFkkauk dGfo.;kr…

Judgment

Cause title

wp-10554.251 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910

WRIT PETITION NO. 10554 OF 2025

AADARSH JIVAN VIKAS PRATISHTHAN LATUR THR SECRETARYSHAIKH IBRAHIM SHAIKH ISMAIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Ameya N. Sabnis Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. ...

CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2025

ORDER :

1.

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned AGPfor respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The present Petition has been filed for quashing and setting aside Government Resolution dated 20thFebruary 2025 issued by the Minority Development Department, State of Maharashtra contending that it is arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

2.

The petitioner has come with the case that the petitioner is wp-10554.252a minority institution declared so by the Education Departmentof the Government of Maharashtra by Government Resolutiondated 30th March 2005. According to the learned Advocate for the petitioner there was no question of any temporary declaration because the Government Resolution does not show that the declaration was for a particular period. Thereafterrespondent No.1 came with another Government Resolution on27th May 2013, wherein the procedure for getting the educational institutions declared as minority institutions, was laid down. Inthe said Government Resolution in Clause No.9, it was stipulated that if the permanent declaration has been given by the Department of the Government earlier, then those institutions need not file any application. Therefore, the petitioner states that the petitioner was exempted. Now again on 20th February2025, another Government Resolution has been introduced wherein there is an introduction of portal by name “AapleSarkar”( vkiys ljdkj ) and it is stated that it is for those minority institutions which have come up prior to July 2017. According to the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the petitioner is supposed to apply again for getting the status declared.

3.

After reading the object with which the Government wp-10554.253Resolution was brought into force, it appears that the Government wants to have a collective data in respect of eventhe institutions who have filed applications OfLine and have been granted such status in the past i.e. prior to July 2017. It has been stated that: “gh ckc fopkjkr ?ksrk tqyS 2017 iwohZ T;k vYila[;k ‘kS{kf.kd laLFkkauhvkWQykbZu ntkZ izek.ki= izkIr d#u ?ksrys vkgs v’kk loZ ‘kS{kf.kd laLFkkaukfMthVy Lok{kjh vlysys izek.ki= iznku dj.;kph ckc ‘kklukP;kfopkjk/khu gksrh-”

Operative part

4.

The Government Resolution dated 20th February 2025,states that:-“ekgs tqYkS] 2017 iwohZ vYila[;kad fodkl foHkkxkekQZr rlspvYila[;kd fodkl foHkkx vfLRkRokr ;s.;kiwohZ ‘kkys; f’k{k.k o dzhMkfoHkkx] mPp o ra= f’k{k.k foHkkx bR;knh foHkkxkaekQZr T;k ‘kS{kf.kdlaLFkkauh /kkfeZd@Hkkf” kd vYila[;kd ntkZ izkIr d#u ?ksryk vkgs] v’kkloZ ‘kS{kf.kd laLFkkauk dGfo.;kr ;srs dh] R;kauh “vkiys ljdkj” https: /aaplesarkar.mahaonline.gov.in ;k ladsrLFkGkojvkWuykbZu in~/krhus vtZ d#u fMftVy Lok{kjh vlysys vYila[;kd ntkZizek.ki= ;k ‘kklu fu.kZ;kP;k fnukadkiklwu 6 efgU;kr izkIr d#u ?;kos-” wp-10554.2545.Bare perusal of the same would show that only the application is to be made to get the certificate which is digitally signed and not fresh renewal. The learned Advocate for the petitioner then states that by another Government Resolutiondated 11th August 2025, the time to get such certificate has been extended till 20th October 2025. He submits that the petitioner would apply with the said Portal and depending upon the response, the petitioner would act accordingly. He seeks therefore, withdrawal of the Petition. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, if occasion arises. [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE asb/OCT25

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn withliberty as prayed for, if occasion arises

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 14.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 10554 of 2025). ← Search more judgments