BALASAHEB RAMKISAN NETKE v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 11 Oct 2022
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, this petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ss. 2(j), 2(s)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of. In the event the said Second Appeal is not yet decided, 2 74- W. P. No. 9264-2022.odt respondent No.2 shall decide the same, on or before 15th November, 2022. The copy of the decision…
Judgment
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr. H. P. Jadhav AGP for Respondent State : Mr. S.G. Karlekar Advocate for respondent MSRTC : Mr. A. B. Dhongade …. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 11.10.2022 PER COURT :-
The petitioner, a bus conductor, is a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947. The respondent Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation is an industry under Section 2 (j) of the Industrial Dispute Act.
Grievance of the petitioner is that his Second Appeal dated 16.12.2017, is still not decided by respondent No.2.
Operative part
In view of the above, this petition is disposed of. In the event the said Second Appeal is not yet decided, 2 74- W. P. No. 9264-2022.odt respondent No.2 shall decide the same, on or before 15th November, 2022. The copy of the decision of the Second Appellate authority, shall be served upon the petitioner within three weeks.
Needless to state, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he would be at liberty to approach the labour Court or the Industrial Court, depending upon the jurisdiction, for the redressal of his grievance (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH ) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,) JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — ss. 2(j), 2(s).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 11 Oct 2022. The bench was SANJAY A DESHMUKH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.