SEEMA SANDIP SHINDE v. SANDIP GOVINDAPPA SHINDE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view thereof, the petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. In view thereof, the petition is dismissed. No order as to It is made clear that if respondent commits subsequent default in paying maintenance, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh application for enforcement of order of maintenance, which shall be considered…
Judgment
SEEMA SANDIP SHINDE VERSUS SANDIP GOVINDAPPA SHINDE ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin N. Kalani Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bharad Pratibha Jagdish and Ms.Jadhav Usha N. … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 10.12.2025 PER COURT :
Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. By way of this petition, the petitioner assails the order dated
17.06.2023 passed below Exhibit 33 by learned Civil Judge, Senior Divisioin, Hingoli in H.M.P. No. 151 of 2019, whereby, application filed by the petitioner for taking action against the respondent due to non compliance of maintenance order came to be rejected.
The learned Counsel for petitioner Mr. Kalani submits that there are arrears of maintenance of more than Rs. 1,20,000/- due upon the respondent and he has failed to comply with the order of payment of maintenance, but the learned trial Court failed to consider this aspect and rejected the application filed by the petitioner.
I have gone through the order passed by the learned trial court, wherein, it has recorded a finding that receipts placed on record showed that respondent has duly complied with the order. 2 1038wp9931.23
Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the order dated
17.06.2023 passed below Exhibit 33 by learned Civil Judge, Senior Divisioin, Hingoli in H.M.P. No. 151 of 2019 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
cost.
Operative part
In view thereof, the petition is dismissed. No order as to It is made clear that if respondent commits subsequent default in paying maintenance, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh application for enforcement of order of maintenance, which shall be considered by the learned trial Court on its own merits. mahajansb/
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view thereof, the petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 10 Dec 2025. The bench was SIDDHESHWAR S THOMBRE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.