✦ High Court of India

BHAGWAN BANDU KOLI v. EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR

Case Details

1 921 to 937 ca 12101-22 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12101 OF 2022 IN FA/3137/2021 BHAGWAN BANDU KOLI VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav ... AND 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12102 OF 2022 IN FA/3136/2021

Legal Reasoning

SANJAY RAJARAM PATIL AND ANOTHER VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12103 OF 2022 IN FA/3138/2021 VINAYAK SAHEBRAO PATIL VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav ... 2 921 to 937 ca 12101-22 + AND 924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12104 OF 2022 IN FA/3139/2021 SHAKUNTALABAI GOPALRAO PATIL (BORSE) VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12105 OF 2022 IN FA/3140/2021 SUMANBAI BHASKAR DHIVARE AND ORS VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav ... AND 926 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12106 OF 2022 IN FA/3141/2021 RAGHUNATH BALIRAM PATIL VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12107 OF 2022 IN FA/3142/2021 3 921 to 937 ca 12101-22 + SATISH RAMDAS PATIL VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav ... AND 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12108 OF 2022 IN FA/3128/2021 SANTOSH HARI PATIL VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12109 OF 2022 IN FA/3123/2021 ANUSAYA PUNDALIK KOLI VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav ... AND 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12110 OF 2022 IN FA/3124/2021 KALPANABAI PANDURANG PATIL AND OTHERS VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR 4 921 to 937 ca 12101-22 + ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12111 OF 2022 IN FA/3126/2021 SATISH PANDIT PATIL AND ANR VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav ... AND 932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12112 OF 2022 IN FA/3127/2021 BALASAHEB CHHAGAN SANER VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12113 OF 2022 IN FA/3129/2021 DHANANJAY GOPICHAND BORSE AND OTHERS VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav 5 921 to 937 ca 12101-22 + ... AND 934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12116 OF 2022 IN FA/3134/2021 NIRMALABAI PITAMBAR KOLI AND ORS VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12117 OF 2022 IN FA/3135/2021 SITARAM RAMCHANDRA PATIL VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. P. N. Kutti ... AND 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12118 OF 2022 IN FA/3132/2021 MANOJ GOVINDRAO PATIL AND OTHERS VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR .... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav ... AND 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12119 OF 2022 IN FA/3133/2021 6 921 to 937 ca 12101-22 + DAMOTABAI BANSI BHIL AND ORS VERSUS EX. DIRECTOR, T.I.D.C., JALGAON THR EX. ENGINEER, H.C.D.CHOPDA, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. R. Patil AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. S. R. Yadav …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. DATED : 23/08/2022. P. C. : 1. Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants in all these applications are seeking withdrawal of deposited amount of compensation by respondent No.1 acquiring body under order dated 02/05/2022 of this court. 2. It appears from the aforesaid order that the acquiring body was asked to deposit 75% of the entire compensation amount within 15 weeks from the date of order. As such, certain period is still available for the acquiring body. The acquiring body has deposited only 1/3rd amount of the aforesaid 75% of the amount in all the concerned appeals. Considering the percentage of deposit of compensation amount, the entire deposited amount at this juncture can be allowed to be withdrawn by the respective applicants on furnishing usual undertakings to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this court. 7 921 to 937 ca 12101-22 + 3. Accordingly, all these civil applications for withdrawal of amount, are allowed and the applicants therein are permitted to withdraw the entire deposited amounts at this juncture in all concerned matters on furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. Accordingly, the

Decision

civil applications are disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments