SHARAD NARAYAN GADHE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb...
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7339 OF 2023 SHARAD NARAYAN GADHE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sontakke Sandeep B. AGP for Respondent No.1/State : Mr. P. S. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 : Mr. V. V. Gujar ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 3 JULY 2023. PER COURT :
#1. The petitioner who retired from service, is before us, now that the respondents have issued the order on 22.12.2020 claiming recovery of Rs.1,62,299/- post his retirement.
#2. We have heard both the sides and perused the papers.
#3. The issue is squarely covered by the decision in the matter of State of Punjab and Other Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer), reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334. 2 69(iii).WP-7339-2023.doc
#4. The petition is allowed.
#5. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb...
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.