Asaram Janrao Khedkar v. The State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Jul 2022
- Bench
- RAVINDRA V GHUGE
Outcome
Disposed of
In these circumstances, this petition is disposed off
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. We find from the pleadings as well as the record available before us that, no application for interim stay/interim relief was filed by the petitioners along with their revision application U/Sec. 23(2) of the Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906 (for short “said Act”). 1 wp…
Judgment
Mr. Sandip R. Andhale, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. D. R. Kale, G.P. for respondent nos 1 to 4. CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. DATED : JULY 06, 2022. PER COURT : . This matter was mentioned at 10.30 a.m. expressing grave urgency. We, therefore, granted production of this matter on the production board after lunch.
We find from the pleadings as well as the record available before us that, no application for interim stay/interim relief was filed by the petitioners along with their revision application U/Sec. 23(2) of the Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906 (for short “said Act”). 1 wp 6966.22.odt
The petitioners have made a grievance that the order passed by the Mamlatdar U/Sec. 5(2) of the said Act, which is impugned before the revisional authority, is to be executed on 08th July, 2022.
Operative part
In these circumstances, this petition is disposed off permitting the petitioners to file an application for interim relief/interim stay before the revisional authority and seek orders from the revisional authority.
No costs. [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ] 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In these circumstances, this petition is disposed off
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Jul 2022. The bench was RAVINDRA V GHUGE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.