✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Jul 2025

The Vice Chancelloer Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krashi Vidyapeeth v. Santabai Mugaji Avhad

Wp No. 3974 of 2024ROHIT W JOSHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Writ petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. [ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.] Narwade

Judgment

Cause title

Mr. Kausalye S. P., Advocate for the Petitioners/Appellants

Mr. Vijay Parag, Advocate for R/Sole ...

CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : 25th JULY 2025

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

1.

This petition arises out of order passed by the learned Industrial Court rejecting the application for condonation of delay filed by the petitioner in preferring appeal under Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

2.

It is undisputed that the delay is more than 120 days. In view of Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 the outer limit for Narwade 932-wp-3974-2024 -2- condonation of delay is 120 days.

3.

It is well settled that when statute prescribes an outer limit for condonation of delay, delay beyond the said period cannot be condoned. Apart from this, the only explanation offered by the petitioner is that vide notification dated 16.04.2019 the Competent Authority and Appellate Authority which were earlier Labour Court and Industrial Court respectfully were altered and the same were notified as Assistant Labour Commissioner and Labour Commissioner respectively. It is not the case of the petitioners that in view of the notification, appeal was filed before any wrong forum therefore the explanation also does not merit consideration for delay of inordinate period of over two years in preferring appeal.

4.

In that view of the matter, the order passed by the learned Industrial Court does not call for any interference.

Operative part

5.

Writ petition is dismissed.

6.

Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. [ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.] Narwade

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — s. 7(7).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 25 Jul 2025. The bench was ROHIT W JOSHI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wp No. 3974 of 2024). ← Search more judgments