The Vice Chancelloer Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krashi Vidyapeeth v. Santabai Mugaji Avhad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 s. 7(7)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. [ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.] Narwade
Judgment
Cause title
Mr. Kausalye S. P., Advocate for the Petitioners/Appellants
Mr. Vijay Parag, Advocate for R/Sole ...
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : 25th JULY 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
This petition arises out of order passed by the learned Industrial Court rejecting the application for condonation of delay filed by the petitioner in preferring appeal under Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
It is undisputed that the delay is more than 120 days. In view of Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 the outer limit for Narwade 932-wp-3974-2024 -2- condonation of delay is 120 days.
It is well settled that when statute prescribes an outer limit for condonation of delay, delay beyond the said period cannot be condoned. Apart from this, the only explanation offered by the petitioner is that vide notification dated 16.04.2019 the Competent Authority and Appellate Authority which were earlier Labour Court and Industrial Court respectfully were altered and the same were notified as Assistant Labour Commissioner and Labour Commissioner respectively. It is not the case of the petitioners that in view of the notification, appeal was filed before any wrong forum therefore the explanation also does not merit consideration for delay of inordinate period of over two years in preferring appeal.
In that view of the matter, the order passed by the learned Industrial Court does not call for any interference.
Operative part
Writ petition is dismissed.
Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. [ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.] Narwade
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — s. 7(7).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 25 Jul 2025. The bench was ROHIT W JOSHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.