Civil Application No. 9580 of 2010 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
and the restoration of the Writ Petition is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Counsel submits that due to difficulties faced by him, the Office objections could not be removed. Therefore, the dismissal was ordered. There was no intention according to him to purposefully avoid compliance. Considering the averments in the Application, delay is condoned and the restoration…
Judgment
Mr. R.P. Dhase, Advocate for the applicant. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:-
Operative part
Counsel submits that due to difficulties faced by him, the Office objections could not be removed. Therefore, the dismissal was ordered. There was no intention according to him to purposefully avoid compliance. Considering the averments in the Application, delay is condoned and the restoration of the Writ Petition is allowed on condition that the Office objections shall be removed within two weeks. If the same are not removed within two weeks, the Application for restoration shall be deemed as dismissed. C.A. disposed of. DT. : 22.07.2010 [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] Sd/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.