✦ Bombay High Court

Sachin Omprakash Dhillod & Anr. v. The State of Mah.)

K U CHANDIWAL

Case at a glance

Bench
K U CHANDIWAL

Outcome

Disposed of

Criminal Application is disposed of in

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. Criminal Application is disposed of in above terms. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran2836.09

Judgment

or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Sandeep P. Deshmukh, Adv. for applicants; Mr.KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14 th September,2009.

1.

Heard learned Counsel and learned APP.

2.

In an offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of IPC, discretion in terms of Section 438 Cr.P.C. is sought.

3.

The accused/applicant no.1 is husband, no.2 is father-in-law; no.3 is mother- in-law; no.4 is cousin (sister of mother-in-law).

4.

The matter revolves to matrimonial acrimony. Custodial interrogation is not warranted. The parties may patch-up their differences considering their respective age. However, at this stage, order in following terms.

5.

In the event of arrest of the accused/applicants Crime No.I-33/2009, registered at Camp Ahmednagar Police Station, each one of them be released on their furnishing PR 2 bond and surety in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand).

6.

The accused/applicant - Sachin Omprakash Dhillod to attend the concerned Investigator on every Sunday between

10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. till filing of charge sheet.

7.

The applicants/accused shall not coerce the victim/complainant.

Operative part

8.

Criminal Application is disposed of in above terms. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran2836.09

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Application is disposed of in

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments