Eknath v. Sabhapati / Sachiv, Krushi Utpanna Bazar Samiti, Jamner, Taluka : Jamner, District
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Hence, the petition is dismissed. However, taking into consideration the facts of the case, the learned Judge of the Labour Court is directed to expedite hearing of Complaint (ULP) No. 39/2008, filed by the petitioner, and decide the same on its own merits, as…
Judgment
Cause title
Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. V.Y. Patil, Advocate, for the respondent. ..........................
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER 2009. COURT'S
ORDER :
(2)
By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 4th March 2009 passed by the learned Judge of the Labour Court, below Exhibit U-9 in Complaint (ULP) No. 39/2008, thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner, for interim relief, under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 29th June 2009, passed by the learned Member of the Industrial Court, Jalgaon, in Revision Application No. 22/2009, thereby dismissing the revision filed by the present petitioner.
Since the petition arises out of concurrent findings of fact and that too, in interlocutory proceedings, I am not inclined to entertain the same in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Operative part
Hence, the petition is dismissed. However, taking into consideration the facts of the case, the learned Judge of the Labour Court is directed to expedite hearing of Complaint (ULP) No. 39/2008, filed by the petitioner, and decide the same on its own merits, as far as possible within a period of six months from today. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE bgp/wp6358
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 19 Nov 2009. The bench was B R GAVAI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.