Vijaysing v. The State of Mah & Ors.

register the FIR whenever facts brought to their notice show that cognizable offence has been made out. In case the police officials fail to do so, the modalities to be adopted are as set out in section 190 read with section 200 of the Code. " The Supreme Court at paragraph 8 has held :- "(1) If any person is aggrieved by the inaction of the police officials in registering the FIR, the modalities contained in section 190 read with section 200 of the Code are to be adopted and observed; (2) It is open to any person aggrieved by the inaction of the police officials to adopt the remedy in terms of the aforesaid provisions. "

A reference may also be made to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P., AIR 2008 Supreme Court 907, wherein the Supreme Court has held that the aggrieved complainant has 3 Criminal W.P.No.476 of 2011 an alternate remedy available under section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In that light of the matter, the petitioner has remedies available in law, which the petitioner may avail of.

We, thus, see no merit in the petition and the petition is, therefore, summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. ( A.V. POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criwp476.11