Civil Application No. 6803 of 2021 · The High Court
Case Details
{1} ca6799.21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6803 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12820 OF 2021 WITH Mrs. S. D. Shelke, advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. S. More, advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J. DATE : 26th September, 2022. PC :
Legal Reasoning
The learned Counsel for the appellant-acquiring body seeks time to take steps against the respective deceased respondents. Stand over to 17.10.2022. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb {2} ca6799.21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8453 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12404 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8462 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.12375 OF 2021 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8469 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12392 OF 2021 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8460 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12380 OF 2021 Mrs. S. D. Shelke, advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. S. More, advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J. DATE : 26th September, 2022. PC : The learned Counsel for the appellant-acquiring body seeks time to take steps against the respective deceased respondents. Stand over to 17.10.2022. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb {3} ca6799.21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6799 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12633 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6801 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12791 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6805 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12807 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6809 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12812 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6807 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12817 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6811 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12797 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6813 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12794 OF 2021 WITH Mrs. S. D. Shelke, advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. S. More, advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J. DATE : 26th September, 2022. PC : The acquiring body, in all these applications, is seeking condonation of delay of 511 days which appears to be caused due to obtaining approvals at various stages. In view of the same and for the reasons mentioned in the applications, delay of 511 days stands condoned. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.
Decision
All these Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb {4} ca6799.21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8455 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12186 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8465 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12386 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8457 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12369 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8467 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12412 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8471 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12399 OF 2021 WITH Mrs. S. D. Shelke, advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. S. More, advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J. DATE : 26th September, 2022. PC : The acquiring body, in all these applications, is seeking condonation of delay of 499 days which appears to be caused due to obtaining approvals at various stages. In view of the same and for the reasons mentioned in the applications, delay of 499 days stands condoned. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. All these Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb {5} ca6799.21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6808 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12817 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6802 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12791 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6814 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12794 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6804 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12820 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6800 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12633 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6806 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12807 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6810 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12812 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6812 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 12797 OF 2021 WITH Mrs. S. D. Shelke, advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. S. More, advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J. DATE : 26th September, 2022. PC : The learned Counsel for the appellant-acquiring body submits that the acquiring body, as per the order dated 27.07.2021, has deposited 50% amounts of the respective impugned awards. The learned Counsel for the Respondents-claimants has also no objection if the stay applications are made absolute on the aforesaid condition. {6} ca6799.21.odt In view of the same, all these stay applications are made absolute in terms of prayer clause “B”. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb {7} ca6799.21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8468 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12412 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8472 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12399 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8454 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12404 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8470 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12392 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8463 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12375 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8461 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12380 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8456 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.N O. 12186 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8458 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12369 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8466 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 12386 OF 2021 Mrs. S. D. Shelke, advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. S. More, advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J. DATE : 26th September, 2022. PC : The learned Counsel for the appellant-acquiring body submits that the acquiring body, as per the order dated 21.08.2021, has deposited 50% amounts of the respective impugned awards. The learned Counsel for the Respondents-claimants has also no objection if the stay applications are made absolute on {8} ca6799.21.odt the aforesaid condition. In view of the same, all these stay applications are made absolute in terms of prayer clause “A”. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb