✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

K U CHANDIWAL

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. The delay is condoned, application is allowed as above. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran1760.09

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1760/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.K.A.Kadam, Advocate for Applicant; ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 29 th September,2009.

1.

Heard learned Counsel.

2.

There is delay of 55 days caused in filing Criminal Revision Application which is sought to be condoned.

3.

The reasons assigned in the application do not indicate any deliberate ommission on the part of the applicant in prosecuting the matter.

4.

The delay is condoned, application is allowed as above. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran1760.09

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments