The State of Maharashtra v. Pandurang Namdeo Wakale
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 30 Jun 2009
- Bench
- R K DESHPANDE
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 302
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 390
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. We have heard Shri Sonawane, learned A.P.P. for applicant and have also perused findings recorded by the trial Court. Upon such perusal, according to us, this is a fit case for grant of leave. Accordingly, this application is allowed. Leave granted. Action under Section…
Judgment
Shri B.J.Sonawane, AGP for applicant. .... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & R.K.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 30/06/2009 ORAL ORDER : This is an application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment of the ad-hoc Additional Judge, Aurangabad, dated 10/2/2009, acquitting respondent-accused for offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C. 2
Operative part
We have heard Shri Sonawane, learned A.P.P. for applicant and have also perused findings recorded by the trial Court. Upon such perusal, according to us, this is a fit case for grant of leave. Accordingly, this application is allowed. Leave granted. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. be taken against respondent accused by the trial Court by issuing bailable warrant of Rs.15,000/-. [R.K.DESHPANDE] JUDGE [P.V.HARDAS] JUDGE umg/ca1653-09
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 302; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 30 Jun 2009. The bench was R K DESHPANDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.