Criminal Application No. 923 of 2025 · Bombay High Court

3Though the compromise-deed containing the terms have been separately filed, yet it can be considered that before the FamilyCourt, Beed, the proceedings was filed for divorce by respondent No.2.In that matter, at Exhibit-10, settlement-deed was filed and it appears that it has been read and recorded on 3rd January, 2025 by the learnedJudge of the Family Court, Beed, wherein there is a specific stipulation of about agreement of respondent No.2 to give no objection for thequashment of the proceedings in R.C.C. No.745 of 2024, before the Judicial Magistrate First Class. Even now also, the same fact or terms are repeated. The verification is before the Section Officer of this Court and therefore, it can be considered that the identity of respondent No.2 is not in question. As the matter had cropped up due to marital discord between applicant No.1 and respondent No.2 and now there is a settlement between them, there is no hurdle in exercising the powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. Hence, the following order is passed:- 37 APPLN.923.2025.odtO R D E RI.The application stands allowed.II.The proceedings in R.C.C. No.745 of 2024, pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class-4, Beed, arising out of FIR vide C.R. No.447 of 2024, dated14th September, 2024, registered with ShivajinagarPolice Station, Taluka and District Beed, for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, stands quashed and set aside as against all the applicants. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ]nga