✦ Bombay High Court · 11 Oct 2012

(Vijay v. The State of Maharashtra) & Anr.

Writ Petition No. 240 of 2012SHRIHARI P DAVARE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, and is disposed of accordingly

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. In view of the said submission, leave granted and the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, and is disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE ............................ bgp/240kwp

Judgment

Appearances : Mr. P.S. Koshti, Advocate, holding for Mr. Satej S. Jadhav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.J. Sonwane, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.1. Mr. S.U. Chaudhari, Advocate, for respondent no.2. ....................... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2012 COURT'S ORDER

1.

Adv. Mr. P.S. Koshti, holding for Adv. Mr. S.S. Jadhav, for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.

Operative part

2.

In view of the said submission, leave granted and the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, and is disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE ............................ bgp/240kwp

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, and is disposed of accordingly

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 11 Oct 2012. The bench was SHRIHARI P DAVARE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 240 of 2012). ← Search more judgments