The State of Maharashtra v. Shivanand Gajanan Bardapure
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. We have heard Shri Sonawane, learned APP for State and we have also perused the record and proceedings. Upon such perusal, according to us, this is a fit case for granting leave. Accordingly, Criminal Application No.1132/2009 is allowed and leave as prayed for is…
Judgment
Cause title
Shri B.J.Sonawane, APP.for petitioner. ... .. RESPONDENTS
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & R.K.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 09/07/2009
ORAL ORDER :
This is an application by which the applicant State seeks leave to file appeal against the judgment of the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-III, Latur dated 24/12/2008, acquitting the respondents for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2
We have heard Shri Sonawane, learned APP for State and we have also perused the record and proceedings. Upon such perusal, according to us, this is a fit case for granting leave. Accordingly, Criminal Application No.1132/2009 is allowed and leave as prayed for is granted. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. be taken against the respondents. [R.K.DESHPANDE] [P.V.HARDAS] JUDGE JUDGE umg/criapln1132-09
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 09 Jul 2009. The bench was R K DESHPANDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.