IN FA/432/2013 NARAYAN LAXMAN DUBALE (DIED) THR LRS RAMKISAN & Ors. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Civil Application stands disposed off
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Relying upon the above judgments and for the reasons stated in the application, civil application No. 9158/2018 is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’. The Civil Application stands disposed off. Abetment stands set aside.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9158 OF 2018 IN FA/432/2013 NARAYAN LAXMAN DUBALE (DIED) THR LRS RAMKISAN AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Jayabhar Dattatraya R. AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. R.V. Dasalkar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Tatyasaheb Bhosle CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 07 OCTOBER, 2022 PER COURT:-
Civil Application No. 9158/2018 is filed for bringing legal heirs of applicant on record.
There is a delay of 596 days in filing this application. Learned counsel for respondent opposes the application.
The Division Bench of this Hon’ble High Court in Keshao Kawadu Maral and another Versus State of Maharashtra, reported in 2005 (supp.) B.C.R. 226, condoned the delay of six years in filing the application of bringing legal heirs on record, relying on Supreme Court 934 -2- judgment of Sardar Amarjit Singh Kalra (Died) by LRs and others Versus Pramod Gupta (Smt.) Dead) by Lrs. And others, reported in (2003) 3 SCC 272.
Operative part
Relying upon the above judgments and for the reasons stated in the application, civil application No. 9158/2018 is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’. The Civil Application stands disposed off. Abetment stands set aside.
Amendment to be carried out within a period of six (06) weeks from today. [ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] SPChauhan
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Civil Application stands disposed off
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 07 Oct 2022. The bench was RAJESH S PATIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.