Sayyed Rashid Sayyed Noor v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Bsnl
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are disposed offfrom the file of this Court
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are disposed offfrom the file of this Court. The Registry is directed to transfer thesematters to the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, expeditiously. Werequest the learned Tribunal to deal with these cases during the CircuitBench hearing at…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABADWRIT PETITION NO. 2949 OF 2024 Sayyed Rashid Sayyed NoorVERSUSBharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Bsnl Through Its General Manager---7 WRIT PETITION NO. 2953 OF 2024 Karim Shah Mehboob ShahVERSUSBharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Bsnl Through Its General Manager--8 WRIT PETITION NO. 2965 OF 2024 Rashid Sha Kabir ShaVERSUSBharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Bsnl Through Its General ManagerMr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the PetitionerMr. Sanjeev B. Deshpande, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Shreyas S. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.1.CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND R. M. JOSHI, JJ.DATE : 1st April, 2024PER COURT :-
The learned Senior Advocate Mr. Deshpande raises anobjection with regard to the maintainability of these matters in this Court. He points out that the Petitioners were former Officers in theBSNL. Considering Section 3(aa), 3(q) and 15[(1) and (2)] of the6 to 8.wp2949.24.odt1 of 2 Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, he submits that these matters willhave to be considered by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Operative part
In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are disposed offfrom the file of this Court. The Registry is directed to transfer thesematters to the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, expeditiously. Werequest the learned Tribunal to deal with these cases during the CircuitBench hearing at Aurangabad. ( R. M. JOSHI, J. )( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )ssp6 to 8.wp2949.24.odt2 of 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are disposed offfrom the file of this Court
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.