✦ High Court of India

DAS SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL MALEWADI THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BABURAO REKHAJI PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Case Details

*1* 24wp2804o23 grp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 WRIT PETITION NO.2804 OF 2023 SHRI SEVADAS SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL MALEWADI THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BABURAO REKHAJI PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … AND 47 WRIT PETITION NO.2830 OF 2023 MAGASVARGIYA SEVALAL SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY LAKHAN GOVINDRAO RATHOD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … AND 49 WRIT PETITION NO.2832 OF 2023 JAIBHAWANI ASHRAM SCHOOL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DILIP BABURAO JADHAV VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … AND 56 WRIT PETITION NO.2851 OF 2023 AHILYADEVI MAHILA BALAK VIKAS MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SHASHIKANT RAMRAO WADKUTE VERSUS *2* 24wp2804o23 grp THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … AND 75 WRIT PETITION NO.2873 OF 2023 NAIK SEVA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SANJAY PARASRAM RATHOD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … AND 87 WRIT PETITION NO.2886 OF 2023 MARATHWADA SARVAJANIK SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT KANTRAO LALSING CHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … AND 88 WRIT PETITION NO.2887 OF 2023 OM SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY KESHAV PRATAPRAO GHUGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … AND 96 WRIT PETITION NO.2899 OF 2023 VASANTRAO NAIK ASHRAM SCHOOL SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT DATTA SAKHARAM RATHOD VERSUS *3* 24wp2804o23 grp THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Legal Reasoning

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vinod B. Jadhav AGPs for the Respondents/State : Shri P.S. Patil, Shri V.M. Kagne, Shri S.P. Tiwari and Shri S.G. Karlekar, in the respective petitions. ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. & DATE :- 13th March, 2023 Per Court :- 1. The petitioners are identically placed. Therefore, the prayers put forth in the first petition to the extent of prayer clauses B and C, are reproduced as under:- “B) Issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to forthwith sanction, release and pay the non-salary grant- in-aid (Building Rent & Maintenance Charges) to the Higher Secondary Ashram School/ Junior College attached to existing Primary & Secondary Ashram Schools being run by the petitioner, as per the Government Resolution dated 26.06.2008 and 17.09.2019 w.e.f. academic year 2012-2013, at par with the other Ashram Schools mentioned in the Government Resolution dated 08.03.2019. C) Pending hearing and final disposal of this Writ Petition, the respondents may please be directed to forthwith sanction, release and pay the non-salary grant-in-aid (Building Rent & *4* 24wp2804o23 grp Maintenance Charges) to the Higher Secondary Ashram School / Junior College attached to existing Primary & Secondary Ashram Schools being run by the petitioner, as per the Government Resolution dated 26.06.2008 and 17.09.2019 w.e.f. academic year 2012-2013, at par with the other Ashram Schools mentioned in the Government Resolution dated 08.03.2019.” 2. We have considered the submissions of the learned Advocate on behalf of the Petitioners and the learned AGPs on behalf of the respondents. It is undisputed that, in so far as the non salary grants are concerned, there has to be an inspection of the institution every year and depending upon the facilities and the criteria to be fulfilled, the non salary grants are released. It is equally undisputed that the non salary grants have got delayed with regard to 148 of the Higher Secondary Ashram Schools and Junior Colleges which are similarly situated. Out of the 148 from V.J.N.T. category schools, the State Government issued Government Resolution dated 08.03.2019 releasing the salary grants of 94 institutions from the date they were delayed/unpaid. 3. The learned Advocate has pointed out an order passed by this court (Coram: Prasanna B. Varale (as His Lordship then was) and S.M. Gavhane, JJ.) dated 13.8.2018, in writ *5* 24wp2804o23 grp petition No. 15292 of 2017 filed by Dnyanodaya Vimukta Jati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. State of Maharashtra and others, wherein, this Court had noted the interim order passed by Nagpur Bench on 13.04.2016 and directed 50% of the outstanding salary grants, to be released within four weeks. 4. We are informed that the inspection by the competent authority with regard to these petitioner institutions, has been carried out. The reports have been submitted to the Government. Depending upon the reports, the Government has to take a conscious decision for granting non salary grants of these institutions. A Government Resolution has been issued on 17.09.2019 pertaining to the remaining 47 institutions, which include these petitioners. The salary grants are approved only from the academic year 2019 onwards. 5. The grievance of these petitioners is that, vide the communication dated 17.3.2021, by Regional Deputy Commissioner, Social Welfare Division, Latur addressed to the Principal Secretary, V.J.N.T. Welfare department, Mantralaya, recommendations were made for releasing the non salary grants from the academic year 2012-13 till 2019-20, the Government cannot issue Government Resolution dated 17.9.2019 and restrict *6* 24wp2804o23 grp the non salary grants for the academic year 2019-20. 6. It is an undisputed fact, that there has to be an annual inspection for continuance of the non salary grants which are payable after the institution complies with the necessary deficiencies/ requirements. We are of the view that when the reports of such inspection are with the Government, the Government has to quickly take a decision with regard to the eligibility of these petitioners for the payment of pending non salary grants. The delay in such decision, results in the accumulation of unpaid non salary grants which results in increasing the financial burden on the Government. If the inspection reports are already tendered to the competent authority, it is in the interest of the Government to take a quick decision and grant the unpaid non salary grants to the institutions, depending upon their eligibility. If any petitioner is held ineligible for any particular period, for the reasons to be assigned in writing, such aggrieved petitioner can approach the competent forum for seeking redressal of his grievance. 7. In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are

Decision

disposed off. 8. Since the learned AGP submit that the decision on *7* 24wp2804o23 grp the claims of these petitioners in the light of the reports received, would be arrived at within 90 days, let such decision be announced by the competent authority, on or before 15.06.2023. 9. Needless to state, if any of the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision of the competent authority, they would be entitled to approach the competent forum for seeking redressal of their grievance. kps (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments