✦ High Court of India · 08 Dec 2022

CHANDRAKANT VYANKATRAO PATIL v. AMIT MOHANRAO KADAM AND OTHERS

Case Details

2918.23wp (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 110 WRIT PETITION NO.2918 OF 2023 CHANDRAKANT VYANKATRAO PATIL VERSUS AMIT MOHANRAO KADAM AND OTHERS …. Mr Chandrakant Vyankatrao Patil – Petitioner – Party in person Mr S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents/State CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 15th March, 2023 PER COURT: 1. The title of this petition is as under :- “WRIT PETITION NO. 2918 OF 2023 ‘MANDAMUS/PROHIBATIONARY/QUOWARANTO/SLP IN WRIT PETITION NO.1380 OF 2021” 2. Writ Petition No.1380/2021 was heard by this Court

Legal Reasoning

(Coram : Smt. Vibha V. Kankanwadi and Y. G. Khobragade, JJ.) and the matter was reserved on 11/10/2022. The petitioner was not a party to the said petition. The judgment was pronounced on

Decision

08/12/2022 and the writ petition was allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B), (C), (D), which read as under :- 2918.23wp (2) By issuing Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate B) writ, order or direction in the like nature, the impugned order/communication dated 20th March 2020 issued by respondent no.2-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, may kindly be quashed and set aside and for that purpose issue necessary orders. C) By issuing writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the like nature, the respondent no.2-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, may kindly be directed to grant approval in favour of the petitioner for the post of Shikshan Sevak w.e.f. 10.09.2015 to 09.09.2018 and thereafter as Assistant Teacher w.e.f. 10.09.2018 in regular pay scale in the Respondent No. 4- School and release salary of the petitioner due and payable to him by quashing impugned order dated 20th of March 2020 issued by the Respondent No. 2. D) By issuing writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the like nature, the respondent nos.2 to 4 may kindly be directed to pay to the petitioner the regular salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 10th of September 2015 and for that purpose issue necessary orders.” 3. The first paragraph in this writ petition filed by the Petitioner in person runs into more than five pages and is reproduced verbatim, hereunder :- 1] Present petitioner clean hand, clean mind, indigent, innocent alone party in person most respectfully submits that, callback the black stigma unconstitutional impugned order dt. 08/12/2022 in 2nd bogus wp/1380/2021 which 2918.23wp (3) bogus 1st wp/12470/2019 was already dismissed of present orig. petitioner and present resp. no. 1 and resp. no. 5 himself illegal petitioner who himself trustee member resp. no. 5 both are them and callback with dismissed above bogus 2nd wp/1380/2021. Of Illegal black stigma unconstitutional impugned order dt.08/12/2022 with order dt. 10/08/2022 in 2nd bogus wp/31/2017 which black stigma unconstitutional impugned order of Hon'ble High Court. Resp. no.1 himself petitioner and resp. no. 1 and 5 cheated and deceived to the Hon'ble High Court therefore set-aside and same dismissed the above impunged order dt. 8/12/2022 with 10/08/2022 which Hon'ble High Court passed unconstitutionally. Resp.1 to 5 mislaid, cheated deceived to the Hon'ble High Court. Missuse of power new root discovered by master mind resp. no. 1 to 5 when Hon'ble High Court passed still the de-recognization in petition wp/4864/2015 order dt. 05/01/2016 with resp. no. 2 decision dt.01/12/2021 for still the de-recognization of present school which not implement since 8 year and present petitioner suffered unnecessary destroy the life and liberty. Already in wp/9307 erroneous order passed negligency. In one blood relation two categories. Resp.no. 5 Ram Vyanjane criminal and illegal present head master in the place of present petitioner without service in cousin without in service and became illegal headmaster and himself criminal and nephew Rajesh Vyanjane in OBC categories illegally by way of bogus documents violation reservation rules. Already Priti Shivaji Batanpurkar was illegally appointed by resp.no. 5 by father and mother in 2009. New petition herewith now challenging the illegal order of resp. no. 2 & 3. When Hon'ble High Court in still the recognized petition order passed in wp/4864/2015 order dt. 05/01/2016 given direction to the Deputy Director Of Education Pune resp. no. 2 and 3 since 8 years more than 3 times up and down director of education, Pune and resp. no. 2 & 3 passed still the derecognization division on dt.01/12/2021.when resp.no. 2 & 3 passed still the 2918.23wp (4) derecognization decision on dt. 01/12/2021 of present Pratibha Niketan High School, Latur. And Hon'ble High Court what ground given direction in erroneous order dt. 08/12/2022 in bogus 2nd wp/1380/2021 when Hon'ble High Court dismissed his bogus 1st wp/12470/2019. This Hon'ble High Court again erroneous unconstitutional and black stigma order dt. 10/08/2022 in bogus wp/31/2017 himself this also member of bogus trustee on bogus succession certificate when deceived to civil judge and same judge rejected the discharged of present petitioners un-lawfully and present petitioner facing unlawful charge and trial in RCC no. 300179/2015 dt. 22/02/2015 till today use the mandamus, prohibitonary, habeas corpus other appropriate writ disposed of RCC no.300179/2015 give the strict order to CJM Court Latur with compensation when deprived the life and liberty which salary wp/10189/2022 before the Hon'ble High Court and callback the erroneous order dt. 10/08/2022 in bougs 2nd wp/31/ 2017,bogus 1st wp/12225/2015 with consideration wp/10631/ 2014 CP/641/2016,CP627/2016, wp/9293/2016 its intervention wp/5229/ CA/ the derecognized 2015,wp/9307/2016 with still the wp/4864/2015 order dt.05/01/2016 derecoganization order dustbin by resp. no. 1 to 6 of present petitioners petitioner. Hon'ble High Court may now decide dignity, certainty, responsibility, accountability without applied the judicial mind all Hon'ble High Court of judicature Bombay bench at Aurangabad without considering the original such fact and circumstances neglected and dustbin to party in persons all petition without consideration with direct mirror burdon of proof not taken on record some are disposed erroneously some are erroneously disposed and some are pending before the Hon'ble High Court with clubbing decide by full bench and all erroneous order black stigma and constitution callback and re-decide with reformation when party in person present petitioner since 2014 from wp/10631/2014 to till in CA/15438/2022, 5956/2018 for still 2918.23wp (5) today harassed, extraction with starvation since dt. 15/06/1988 to till today without promotion. Write the petition carefully after re-observation with compensation of Rs. 50 Corors Rupees decide the fresh till seal the bogus Pratibha Niketan High School, Latur with still the recognized this present school as per the dt. 05/01/2016 in wp/4864/2015 stop the total grant till decide the all matter of present petitioner. Indigent, poured alone, innocent, present petitioners locked the justice and blackmailed the justice. Violation the fundamental rights, violation the nature justice, when committed miscourage of justice from all machineries, abuse of process of court in all court and judiciary therefore with the full bench with 50 coror rupees compensation all cost and suffered expensive charges destroyed and lost the life and liberty, soverginity, dignity, reputation in society of present petitioner burned the life and his family life destroyed children education and his life of present petitioners resp. no. 1 to 5 with all judiciary. Bad massage went in society and education, police and judiciary. When himself order dt. 11/02/2015 in wp/10631/2014 order dt.11/02/2016 and its CP/641/2016, and present bogus pratibha niketan high school, latur still the derecognization order dt. 05/01/2016 in wp/ 4864/2015 himself not consider by himself in CRI.WP/910/2015, CRI.WP/672/2018 and in present bogus petition 2nd wp/1380/2021 with bogus 2nd wp/31/2017. Copy of erroneous black stigma flagrant in justicefull impugned order dt.08/12/2022 10/08/2022 recall and callback for dismiss as per the second bogus wp/31/2017 which passed on 1st bogus wp/12225/2015 with this present bogus 1st wp/1380/2021 black stigma unconstitutional impugned order dt.08/12/2022 recall and callback with cost dismissed, order dt. 24/01/2019 in wp/11257/2018 letter to Hon'ble Registrar dt.19/02/2021, complaint dt. 22/11/2018, 2211/2019, 05/03 /2021, 11/02/2020 with is order dt. 25/01/2021. 1st bogus wp/12470/2019 order dt. 14/10/2019 2918.23wp (6) with bogus signatures list of trustee school tribunal address, succession copy in MA/96/2014. Hon;ble High Court PIL/10/2016 FIR no. 288/ 2017 dt. 24/08/2017 dt. 29/09/2017. FIR NO. 167/2014 dt. 05/09/2014 annexed -A herewith marked at Exh." A"-” 4. This petition runs into 1046 pages. The entire litigation history/journey of the Petitioner, with documents is placed before the Court in the form of Annexures. The prayers put forth in this petition are at page 54. Prayer clauses (A) to (F) read as under :- “A) This mandamus, prohibitionary, slp, quowarranto, writ petition kindly may be allowed humble prayer by present petitioner. B) Recall back the black stigma, erroneous, impugned order dt. 08/12/2022, 10/08/2022 dismiss with bogus 2nd wp/1380/2022, bogus 2nd wp/31/2017. Respectively of resp. no.1 Amit Kadam and Indu Mangesh Gaikwad not a Batanpurkar. Take the serious action against resp. no. 1 to 5 and all include in fraud and forgery. With contempt of court, cri. rigorous punishment, heavy cost and FIR. Banned to adv. Mr. V.S.Panpatte, Suresh Rudrawar, Gunale, Vijay Patil on the ground openly intentionally for deceived purpose filed bogus wp/12470 /2019, bogus 2nd bogus 2nd bogus 1stwp/12225/2015, wp/1380/2021, wp/31/2017, bogus wp/13016/2018 of resp. no. 1 & 5, elder Indu, her middle sister Pratibha petitions dismissed as per above punishment. Rajesh Vyanjanes in one blood relation two categories illegally appointed which stopped the salary of all above illegal teachers with recovery of illegal salary. 2918.23wp (7) Criminal punishment and heavy cost with heavy compensation for present petitioner. detagged wp/31/2017 intervention CA/5956/2018, C) Humble prayer without notice to present petitioners with unconstitutionally wp/9293/2016, in CA/15438/2022 retagged. Till stop the grant of present bogus school, seal the school property with recovery of salary since 1991 to till today. Misuse of public grant without students and showing bogus documentary students managed to resp. no. 2 to 4 and its bogus affidavit submitted in the petitions since 2014 to till today call back and punish to master minds resp. no. 1 to 5 with all master mind teachers playing tactise, fraud. D) Demises the all services of without serviced teachers with recovery of salary since dt. 22/07/1991 to till today. When Mr. Bhadale Dinkar Madhavrao was taken double salary from present school as well as Shamlal Memorial High School, Udgir, Dist.Latur from 01 November to 30 April 1992 approved by resp. no. 4. passed salary bill in same period. Which granted by resp. no. 4. Fir registered rigorous punishment to Mr. Bhadale Dinkar Madhavrao with all teachers without service taken double salary on the ground take that serious action against bogus management and resp. no. 1 & 3 to 5 bogus managements dismiss, recall back the above approvals 1992-93 and new illegal approvals. E) Hon'ble High Court may decide appropriate when destroy dignity of justice by respondent no. 1 to 5 with stop the all grant of present bogus school. F) Shutdown the bogus present Pratibha Niketan High School, Latur stooped the grant with all teachers illegal salary and same dismissed/ still de-recognization this present bogus school, without consideration the students of 2918.23wp (8) future for his son, daughters etc. own benefit is by way of bogus documentary managed to resp. no. 2 to 4. Kindly may be use Mendamus /Prohibationary/ Quowaranto/Slp take the action against CJM Court Latur. Dismissed the RCC/300179/2015 illegal charge and compel the facing unlawful trial and unlawfull scuffle arrest. Flagrant in justicefully to poorest with compensation. Original criminal respondents punish by contempt and FIR, with heavy cost. Present petitioner honest law abiding person not a criminal. Not a head master connect wp/10189/2022. Present petitioner deprived the salary since 15/06/1988 to 11/02/2014 of asst. teacher's, as per the scale not received. Deprived the secondary school head master promotion and salary as per the scale since dt. 12/02/2014 to till today. Humble prayer give on current rate, scale. Dismiss with heavy cost and punishment set-aside/ dismiss the unconstitutional black stigma impugned order dt. 08/12/2022 and 10/08/2022. Bad massage went in society. Grave violation the natural justice, violation the fundamental rights of present petitioners, grave miss courage of justice, grave abuse of process of court. Misuse of power. Garneted protected by king of law/ hierarchy/ ruler. King do not wrong settle principal of the constitutional but your self observe since 2014 to till today.” 5. Since we were unable to gather, as to the pleadings that the Petitioner intended to put forth before us, we asked him whether he desires to file the memo of the petition in Marathi language, as we would permit him. He submits that, he was a 2918.23wp (9) teacher, he is also an LL.B. Graduate and whatever is set out in the petition, is properly pleaded. 6. Hence, we interacted with the Petitioner in Marathi, allowed him to address us in Marathi. It appears that he has a grievance about the Court’s orders, which have been passed by various Courts in various writ petitions in between 2015 to 2022. His contention is that, each petition filed before this Court is a bogus petition. He is not party to many of such petitions. He, therefore, concludes by saying that, though certain petitions have been disposed off with speaking orders and some petitions are pending, this Court should take up all these petitions by calling for all these files and this Court should review the orders passed in writ petitions by Co-ordinate Benches, and by declaring that those petitions are bogus, all these petitions should be dismissed and the orders passed by the Co-ordinate Benches, should be quashed and set aside. 7. We find from the record that, earlier the Petitioner was represented by few Advocates from Aurangabad. The Petitioner has levelled allegations against these Advocates and in fact has 2918.23wp (10) pleaded in this petition that, those lawyers should banned from practicing and criminal action be initiated against them. 8. In view of the above, we cannot entertain this petition. The petitioner is at liberty to deal with each of the causes of action, by taking recourse to the remedies as are provided in law, before the appropriate forum. If he is aggrieved by any judgment or order delivered by this Court in any writ petition, he is at liberty to take recourse to the remedy, as is permissible in law. 9. This petition is dismissed. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments