Shri Ranjit D. Gaikwad, Advocate i/by Shri Choudhary D.J., Advocate for & Ors. v. GHUGE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 ss. 3(q), 15
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that this petition may be disposed off since the Petitioners would file a fresh Original Application before the learned Tribunal. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 WRIT PETITION NO. 6849 OF 2024 CHANDRAKANT HARIKISHAN LAGAD AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Shri Ranjit D. Gaikwad, Advocate i/by Shri Choudhary D.J., Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri R.K. Ingole, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. Per Court :- DATE :- 08th July, 2024
Considering the scope of Section 3(q) and Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the Petitioner will have to approach the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal at Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.
The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that this petition may be disposed off since the Petitioners would file a fresh Original Application before the learned Tribunal. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 — ss. 3(q), 15.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 08 Jul 2024. The bench was Y G KHOBRAGADE, RAVINDRA V GHUGE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.