✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Fa No. 441 of 2005SANJAY A DESHMUKH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

These applications are dismissed for default

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,BENCH AT AURANGABAD.18 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6560 OF 2017IN FA/441/2005VASANT NIVRUTTI CHAUDHARIVERSUSTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR...Advocate for Claimants : Mr. Krishna G. Narwade, h/f Mr. A. B. Kale.AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. S. G. Joshi. Advocate for Acquiring Body : Mr. M. S. Deshmukh. (Absent)...WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2258 OF 2006IN FA/441/2005WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2248 OF 2006IN FA/430/2005WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 524 OF 2010IN FA/441/2005...CORAM :SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.DATE :09th March, 2026. P.C.:1Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused theapplications. Applications for adding parties.2The learned counsel for the applicants / acquiring body isabsent. These applications are dismissed for default. 218-ca.6560.17.odtApplications for withdrawal of amount:3These applications are for withdrawal of the amount depositedby the appellant in this Court as per the impugned judgment andaward. 4The learned AGP counsel for the State strongly opposes theapplication. 5For the reasons stated in the application and considering thearguments of the learned counsel for claimants and the learned AGPas well as the first appeals are disposed of, the following order ispassed :-

Operative part

O R D E RI.The applicants / claimants are permitted to withdrawentire amount deposited by the appellant in this Court, with accrued interest thereon. II.With this, the civil applications for withdrawal of amountstand disposed of.[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Fa No. 441 of 2005). ← Search more judgments