✦ Bombay High Court · 10 Jul 2026

IN WPST/18427/2025 Namdeo Keshavrao Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned and the same is allowed in terms of prayer Clause “C”.

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5757 OF 2026 IN WPST/18427/2025 Namdeo Keshavrao Pawar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. G. K. Chinchole h/f. Mr. Bhaskar P. Gonare, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. K. Tekale, AGP for Respondents/State ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 10th JULY 2026 P. C. :-

#2. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned and the same is allowed in terms of prayer Clause “C”.

#3. Office objections be removed within a period of four (4) weeks from today. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Narwade

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wpst No. 18427 of 2025). ← Search more judgments