VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA … Mr. A.A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for & Ors. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRAFULLA S KHUBALKAR, MANGESH S PATIL
- Neutral citation
- 2025:BHC-AUG:3160-DB
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The order be corrected, accordingly, and a corrected order be uploaded. kps ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // *2* 2wp1583o25 spk (This order dated 03.02.2025 stands corrected and uploaded…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1583 OF 2025 JANKALYAN BAHUDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. A.A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. S.S. Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent No.3. ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. Per Court :- DATE : 07th February, 2025 The motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 03.02.2025.
The learned advocate Mr. Pulkundwar points out that his appearance is not shown in the said order.
The name of Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, advocate for respondent No.3, be shown in the title clause of the order dated
03.02.2025.
The order be corrected, accordingly, and a corrected order be uploaded. kps ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // *2* 2wp1583o25 spk (This order dated 03.02.2025 stands corrected and uploaded in view of the order dated 07.02.2025 passed on the Motion for speaking to the minutes) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 47 WRIT PETITION NO. 1583 OF 2025 JANKALYAN BAHUDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms.S.S.Joshi, AGP for the respondent/State. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent No.3. PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. ) ( CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PER COURT : DATE : FEBRUARY 3, 2025
The petitioner/school is seeking reimbursement u/s 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
Operative part
2. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to examine the petitioners’ proposal/claim on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within 6 weeks.
3. If and to the extent the petitioners are found entitled to receive the reimbursement, that shall be disbursed within 6 weeks thereafter. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) khs/Feb.2025/1583
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 — s. 12.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.