Amar Vasantrao Kothimbire v. The State of Mah & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition stands disposed of accordingly
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Respondent no.2 Committee is, therefore, directed to decide the claim of the petitioner regarding petitioner's claim of belonging to "Khatik" - Scheduled Caste, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, within a period of six months from the date of submission of the…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1178 OF 2012 Amar Vasantrao Kothimbire ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr C.V. Dharurkar, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr K.M. Suryavanshi, A.G.P. for respondents CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 6th February, 2012 PER COURT : Leave to delete respondents no.3 & 4.
#2. The petition is filed for a limited purpose for a direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the proposal of the petitioner for grant of validity certificate.
#3. The petitioner claims to be belonging to "Khatik", which is recognised as a Scheduled Caste. 2 W.P. No.1178 of 2012
#4. Respondent no.2 Committee is, therefore, directed to decide the claim of the petitioner regarding petitioner's claim of belonging to "Khatik" - Scheduled Caste, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, within a period of six months from the date of submission of the proposal. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) (B.R. GAVAI, J.) amj/wp1178.12
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Feb 2012. The bench was SUNIL P DESHMUKH, B R GAVAI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.