Chandrakant Rajaram Kale v. Rukmini Sahkari Bank Ltd & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 18 Aug 2025
- Bench
- ROHIT W JOSHI
Outcome
Allowed
Society, Civil Application for amendment of petition is allowed with
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Civil Application is disposed of. [ROHIT W. JOSHI J.] Narwade/
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 136 OF 2025 IN WP/12363/2024 Chandrakant Rajaram Kale VERSUS Shri Rukmini Sahkari Bank Ltd Through Its Branch Manager And Others ... Mr. Chandrakant K. Shinde, Advocate for Applicant Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2. Mr. T. C. Shinde, Advocate for R/3b In W.p. Mr. P. S. Dighe, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in WP. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12363 OF 2024 … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2025 P.C.: WRIT PETITION NO. 12363 OF 2024 :-
The learned Counsel for the petitioner raises preliminary objection with respect to availability of alternate remedy under Section 154(2) of the Maharashtra co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (“MCS Act”).
The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the proceedings under Section 101 of the MCS Act were initiated despite the fact that the loan was duly insured. In order to show bonafide, petitioner is directed to deposit sum of Rs. 2,25,000/- which is near about 50% of the outstanding amount, with this Court on or before
08.09.2025.
List the petition for further consideration on 10.09.2025. Narwade/ 2 7-ca-136-2025.odt CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 136 OF 2025 :-
Operative part
Despite opposition by the learned Counsel for Respondent- Society, Civil Application for amendment of petition is allowed with leave to respondent-society to file affidavit in reply with respect to additional contentions to be incorporated in the petition.
Civil Application is disposed of. [ROHIT W. JOSHI J.] Narwade/
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Society, Civil Application for amendment of petition is allowed with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Societies Act, 1960.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Aug 2025. The bench was ROHIT W JOSHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.