✦ Bombay High Court · 18 Jun 2025

IN WP/9723/2024 v. BHAGWAN BABURAO SAVLE & Ors.

Wp No. 9723 of 2024ROHIT W JOSHI

Case at a glance

Decided
18 Jun 2025
Bench
ROHIT W JOSHI

Outcome

Allowed

In view of the above, the application is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above, the application is allowed. Delay of 607 days is condoned. Permission is granted to bring the names of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.3 on record.

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 593 OF 2025 IN WP/9723/2024 MANIK DEVCHAND PATIL VERSUS BHAGWAN BABURAO SAVLE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Vijay Y. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. V.D. Karande h/f Mr.A. M. Salok … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : 18th June, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay and seeking permission to bring legal representative of deceased respondent no.3 on record.

2.

The learned advocate for respondent nos.3a and 3b, the proposed legal representatives, does not have any objection for condonation of delay and permitting to bring the names of respondent nos.3a and 3b on record as legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.3.

Operative part

3.

In view of the above, the application is allowed. Delay of 607 days is condoned. Permission is granted to bring the names of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.3 on record.

4.

List Writ Petition No.9723/2024 for hearing on admission on 28th July, 2025. sga/ [ROHIT W. JOSHI] JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the application is allowed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 18 Jun 2025. The bench was ROHIT W JOSHI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wp No. 9723 of 2024). ← Search more judgments