MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHATNA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Ors.
Judgment
MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHATNA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner: Mr.Shelke Shivaji T. Mr.VH Dighe, AGP for Respondents. ***** CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & A.B.CHAUDHARI,JJ. DATE : 4 th October,2012. PER COURT : 1) Heard. The petitioner-union claims that its 17 members, who are the Daily rated employees of Jintur and Selu range of Social Forestry Department, have not been paid their legitimate wages since 2010-2011. 2) The Respondent No.5 has filed affidavit in reply. We have perused the same. In para 7 of the reply, the deponent contends that the petitioner- union has straight-way approached this Court without availing the opportunities of Labour Court, Industrial Court or the higher authorities. 3) In the facts of the case, we find that the petitioner/union has alternate and efficacious remedy in approaching the Labour/Industrial Court, which it did not resort to. All issues are kept open. 2 4) With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (A.B.CHAUDHARI) (NARESH H.PATIL) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.