Maharashtra v. Newton Engineering Chemicals Ltd
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 30 Apr 2026
- Bench
- BHARAT, GAUTAM A ANKHAD
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. At this stage, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks extension of the interim order dated 2nd December 2025 for four weeks. The prayer is rejected in view the judgment delivered today in Commercial Arbitration Appeal No. 1 of 2026 which arises out of…
Judgment
Mr. Anagh Pradhan with Ms. Aneesha Munshi, Ms. Sonam Panday, Advocates, i/by Divya Shah Associates, for the Appellant-Original Petitioner. Mr. Bernardo Reis (through V.C.) with Mr. Pratik Dixit, i/by Dr. Prem Motiramani, Advocates for the Respondent. CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. DATE : 30TH APRIL 2026 bdp-sps P.C. The judgment is delivered in the open Court in the presence of the learned counsels for the parties.
Commercial Arbitration Appeal no.1 of 2026 is dismissed.
Let the original copy of the judgment be placed in the records.
At this stage, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks extension of the interim order dated 2nd December 2025 for four weeks. The prayer is rejected in view the judgment delivered today in Commercial Arbitration Appeal No. 1 of 2026 which arises out of an order of dismissal passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in the petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ] BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT bdp-sps
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 30 Apr 2026. The bench was BHARAT, GAUTAM A ANKHAD.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.