O. O. C. J v. Jaiprakash Tripathi
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Ramniranjan Podar High Schhol (CBSE) & Anr. .... Mr. K.D. Dani for the Petitioner. Ms. Anupama Deshpande for Respondent No.1. ..... ...Respondents. CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI,C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. September 6, 2004. P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner craves leave of the Court to withdraw this petition, in order to avail of alternative remedy under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents undertakes not to take the plea of limitation if the appeal is filed within three weeks from today. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Sep 2004. The bench was D Y CHANDRACHUD.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.