Jet Airways (India) Limited v. IDFS Tradings (Pvt.) Limited
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of accordingly with the aforesaid directions
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Petition is disposed of accordingly with the aforesaid directions. (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1018 OF 2012 Jet Airways (India) Limited ..... Petitioner Versus IDFS Tradings (Pvt.) Limited ..... Respondent Mr.E.P.Bharucha, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms.Sheetal Sabnis, Ms.Ispita Sen, i/b. Gagrats for the Petitioner. Mr.Shiraz Rustomji, Senior Advocate with K.G.Mhatre, Saroja Jha, i/b. Mhatre & Associates for the Respondent. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 3 rd OCTOBER, 2012 P.C. : The Learned Senior advocate Shri E.P.Bharucha states that this application made under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 be treated as application under Section 17 which would be pressed by the Petitioner before the Learned arbitrator already appointed by consent of both the parties. The Learned Counsel therefore does not press relief under Section 9. All contentions are kept open.
Operative part
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of accordingly with the aforesaid directions
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 9.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.