IRCON International Ltd v. M/s.V.S.Construction Co
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Shri P.K.Samdhani with Arun Siwach i/by M/s.Amarchand Mangaldas & S.A.Shroff & Co for the Petitioners. Shri Atul Rajadhyaksha with Kedar Wagle for the Respondents. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : AUGUST 04, 2007. DATED : AUGUST 04, 2007. DATED : AUGUST 04, 2007. DATED P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. My attention has been invited to averments made in paragraph No.6 of this Petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996. In view of the said averments and in view of the relevant clause in general conditions of the contract, this Petition will not lie in this Court. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to return the Petition to the Petitioners for presentation to the appropriate Court. Papers of the Petition be returned forthwith. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 04 Aug 2007. The bench was ABHAY S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.