ITI Ltd & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.961 OF 2009 ITI Ltd. & anr. State of Maharashtra .... Petitioners .... Respondents Mr.A. Singh Gautama i/b. Dhir & Dhir Associates for the petitioners. Mr.Ravi Prakash with Mr.Rahul Sinha for the respondents. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 2nd September, 2009 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with liberty. 2 The petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.