✦ Bombay High Court

Lotus Trading Corp Limited, a Company v. NED Energy Limited, a Company

Company Petition No. 766 of 2008A M KHANWILKAR3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.Umang Jaju i/b D. H. Law Associates for the Petitioner Mr. M. S. Bhardwaj and Ms. Neesha Valani i/b Mr. S. K. Mohopatra for Regional Director. Mr. S. Ramakantha, Dy. Official Liquidator. 2 Coram : A. M. Khanwilkar, J. Dated:- 12 th December, 2008

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The sanction of the Court is sought under section 391 to 394 to the Companies Act, 1956 to a Scheme of Amalgamation between Lotus Trading Corp. Ltd and NED Energy Limited, the Transferee Company.

3.

The Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners states that the Petitioner / Transferor Company is a 100% subsidiary of the Transferee company and by an order dated 27th June, 2008 passed by the Court in Company Application No. 994 of 2008, the filing of separate Application and Petition by the Transferor company was dispensed with.

4.

Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner has stated that they have complied with all the requirements as per directions of the Court and they have filed necessary affidavits of compliance in this Court. Moreover the Petitioner Company also undertakes to comply with all statutory requirements, if any as 3 required under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Rules made there under.

5.

The Regional Director has filed affidavit stating therein that the Scheme is not prejudicial to the interest of Creditors and Shareholders and public.

6.

The Official Liquidator has filed report stating that the affairs of the Petitioner Company have been conducted in a proper manner and that the Transferor company may be ordered to be dissolved.

7.

Upon perusal of the entire material on record, the Scheme appears to be fair and reasonable and is not violative of any provisions of law and is not contrary to any public policy. None of the parties concerned have come forward to oppose the Scheme.

8.

There is no objection to the Scheme and since all the requisite statutory compliance have been fulfilled, the Company Petition No.766 of 2008 is made absolute in terms of prayers clauses (a) to (f) of the Petition. 4

9.

The Transferee Company to lodge a copy of this order and the Scheme with concerned Superintendent of Stamps for the purpose of adjudication of stamp duty, if any, on the same within 30 days of obtaining the authenticated and/ or certified copy of the Order.

10.

The Petitioner Company to pay costs of Rs.7,500/- each to the Regional Director and to the Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay. Costs to be paid within 4 weeks from today.

11.

Filing and issuance of the drawn up order is dispensed with.

12.

All concerned authorities to act on a copy of this Order duly authenticated by Company Registrar, High Court Bombay. (A. M. Khanwilkar J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Company Petition No. 766 of 2008). ← Search more judgments