Suleman Fakhruddin v. The State of Maharashatra
Judgment
Mr. D.S. Sakhalkar, for the Petitioner Mr. K.R.Belosey, AGP for respondent No.1. Mrs. A.K. Savla, for respondent No.5. CORAM: F.I.F.I.F.I. REBELLO REBELLO &&& REBELLO ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of land identified under CTS No.43 and the SRA without authority of law has shown in the S.R.A. Scheme access road through his property. If this be the case, it will be open to the petitioner to file a civil suit. Hence this is not a fit case for this Court to exercise extra ordinary jurisdiction. With the above observation petition disposed of. REBELLO, J.) (F.I.F.I.F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.