✦ Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2011

Kalli Arun Kumar Venkat Rao v. K. Leela Venkat Rao

ROSHAN DALVI

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1113 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 3486 OF 1996 Kalli Arun Kumar Venkat Rao ...Plaintiff Vs. K. Leela Venkat Rao widow of late Kalli Venkat Rao ...Defendants Mr. Chinmay Gupte i/b. Mohit Gadkar for the Plaintiff None for the Defendants CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2011 P.C. :

1.

The Defendant No.1 has expired. His heirs are already on record. Only an entry in that behalf is required to be made. The name of Defendant No.1 shall stand deleted.

2.

The Chamber Summons is disposed off accordingly.

(SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments