Company Petition No. 418 of 2005 · Bombay High Court · 2006
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Companies Act, 2013 ss. 391(2), 394
Judgment
Mr.C.J. Joy with Mr.D.A. Dube panel Counsel i/b T.C. Kaushik for Regional Director, Department of Company Affairs Maharashtra, Mumbai. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2006. P.C. :
The Petitioners in Company Petition Nos.418 of 2005 and 419 of 2005 are the transferor companies. The Petitioner in Company Petition No.420 of 2005 is the transferee company.
The Regional Director in his affidavit stated : 2 : that the scheme is not prejudicial to the interest of the creditors and the shareholders.
The only objectionw taken by the Official Liquidator
3. The Petition is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) to (.....). : 3 :
Costs of the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator fixed at Rs.2500/- each. . Filing and issuance of the drawn up order is dispensed with. . All concerned parties to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Company Registrar of this Court.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013 — ss. 391(2), 394.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Jan 2006. The bench was S VAZIFDAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.